The SDG 11 review: sustainable cities and communities

6th meeting · 9 July 2026 · UN Headquarters, New York
Session
“SDGs in focus: SDG 11 and interlinkages with other SDGs, sustainable cities and communities,” interactive panel (Conference Room 4, 3:00 to 6:00 PM)
Chair
Lok Bahadur Thapa (President of ECOSOC)
Moderator
Robbert Dijkgraaf (President-Elect, International Science Council)
Panellists
Anacláudia Rossbach (Executive Director, UN-Habitat) and Abimbola Akinajo (Managing Director, Lagos Metropolitan Area Transport Authority)
Lead discussant
Katherine Kline (International Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse)

Cities came last and arrived first

The review opened with a piece of institutional history that explains a decade of neglect. SDG 11 was drafted late, almost as an afterthought, and ten years on the goal has turned out to sit underneath most of the others. The session ran alongside the tenth anniversary of the New Urban Agenda, whose mid-term review follows the week after.

Anacláudia Rossbach, UN-Habitat: “When SDG 11 was conceived, it came last minute towards the end, and now we learn after 10 years that cities are actually at the forefront. So local action is critical for climate action, local action is critical for the SDGs.”

The numbers presented from the Secretary-General’s progress report set the terms. The slum population has climbed to 1.16 billion, roughly one in four urban residents in 2024, and could pass 1.2 billion by 2030. Access to convenient public transport rose from 53.2% to 61.5% between 2020 and 2025. Only about 17% of urban land is given to streets and public open space, against a target range of 30% to 45%.

Housing as the keystone

Rossbach’s argument, consistent with the press briefing she gave that morning, is that housing is not one sector among several. It is the precondition for the others, and the reason SDG 11 propagates into education, health and employment outcomes.

Anacláudia Rossbach: “Housing can be a solution, actually, for almost all SDGs. If we want to amplify the access to education, kids need to have a safe house to come back and do their homework. You need an address if you want to find a job.”

She was blunt about where the failure sits, calling a billion people in informal settlements unacceptable and warning against another generation of children born in slums. She also named an exclusion that planning rarely admits.

Anacláudia Rossbach: “Cities have not been planned by women, with women, or for women in the past.”

Katherine Kline, the lead discussant, pressed the same point into a method. The solutions are known; the deficit is in how they are produced and scaled.

Katherine Kline: “Cities are most sustainable when policies are designed with communities rather than simply for them.”

Lagos, and the minibus problem

Abimbola Akinajo, who runs Lagos’s transport authority, supplied the review’s most practical testimony. Lagos holds roughly 22 million people, takes in two to three thousand more every day, and generates about 30 million trips daily. Her first argument was governance: national governments adopt the Agenda and then leave it at the national level.

Abimbola Akinajo, LAMATA: “You need to begin to bring it down, cascade it down to the cities, who are the ones who have to deal with this matter anyway, so that the cities are ensuring to be vested, funded, and committed.”

Her second was that the informal minibus, the danfo in Lagos and the matatu elsewhere, cannot carry a growing city, and that mass transit is the only arithmetic that works. Her third cut against the framing of the whole goal: the pressure on cities originates outside them. What drives urban population, she argued, is the absence of infrastructure in rural places, so cities cannot be fixed by working only on cities.

Mapping the invisible

The measurement thread ran through the whole afternoon, and Rossbach put it most directly. A city plans for the people it can see, and it cannot see the ones who never enter a dataset.

Anacláudia Rossbach: “We have to incorporate in the data people that were not visible. For example, all these people walking in Lagos, they are in no data to start with. So we have to map the reality.”

The interactive discussion turned into an unusually concrete exchange on how cities are counted. Voluntary Local Reviews were the dominant instrument: Zambia is targeting a review for all 116 of its local authorities by 2028, Italy folded 14 local reviews into its national review, Norway, Malaysia, Belgium, Portugal and Indonesia all reported local review programmes, and Germany described an open-source AI platform in Hamburg for producing them. Poland reported an SDG experimental statistics platform built on geospatial and Earth-observation data, feeding a toolkit for municipalities. Akinajo’s closing plea was for data linking across agencies rather than more data collection, so that cities stop working in silos.

Speaking for the Group of Friends on Science for Action, India supplied the sentence that connects this review to Science Day, held that same morning and moderated, like this session, by Robbert Dijkgraaf.

India, for the Group of Friends on Science for Action: “What lags is not knowledge, but the institutional capacity to plan and govern across interconnected urban systems.”

Why it matters for the SDGs

SDG 11 is the fourth of the five goals under in-depth review in 2026, and this session showed why it behaves less like a sector and more like a substrate: it carries SDG 1 (poverty), SDG 10 (inequality), SDG 13 (climate) and SDG 6 (water) inside it. Around 2 billion more people are expected to move to cities in the coming decades, concentrated in Africa and Southeast Asia. The counting problem is the one to watch. A goal about cities is measured mostly by national statistics, and the residents least likely to appear in those statistics are exactly the billion-plus living in the settlements the goal exists to reach.

Watch & read

Quotations are lightly edited from an automated (Otter.ai) transcript of the UN Web TV recording and should be read as close paraphrase. Speaker names and titles were reconciled against the official HLPF annotated programme and public records. Roughly fifty delegations took the floor; interventions delivered in Arabic, Chinese, French and Spanish were not usable from the transcript, so those countries’ positions are not summarised here. Statements are attributed to countries rather than to individuals, and figures cited by delegations were not independently verified.